Kevin, Actually, with mirrored rules, you would only need to maintain it in one place (webtop / content / containers). Everywhere you want the display to be had, you just select the rule to mirror, and off you go.
Tomek On Mar 14, 9:51 am, Kevin Purcell <[email protected]> wrote: > While I can see this approach being okay for content which is only > displayed in one place on the site, I can think of situations where > such content might need to be displayed in multiple places. In such > cases, presumably the ordering of the data would need to be maintained > separately for each occurrence. This might prove to be somewhat > counter-intuitive to the client. > > I think what I was looking for ideally was a way to define a property > for a content type which would be used solely for defining the order > or perhaps the 'importance' of each content item in relation to all > other items. Then wherever that content type is used, the ordering of > the items would be maintained without having to do so manually for > each occurrence. -- You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group. To post, email: [email protected] To unsubscribe, email: [email protected] For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev -------------------------------- Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry
