Aside from that, FU does have some issues running in a shared environment. Most ISPs are not likely to install a Java servlet without having the source code to know what it is doing. Also, FU uses a file in the same directory as the .class file to map all the URLs. Using FarCry to create this file would mean that all the shared instances of FarCry would overwrite the file.
FU Servlet I believe is or will be released under CPL -- same license as FarCry CMS. Spike is the only one who can confirm this though.
FarCry just calls the servlet -- it doesn't write direct to the persistent mapping file. So any number of FarCry apps and other Java/CF based apps for that matter, can leverage FU Servlet in a shared environment.
The only potential issue is that many applications (or domains) with many pages may lead to a very large cache of mapped URLs -- I guess this might be a potential performance bottleneck. However, we are yet to hear a report of FU performance problems.
-- geoff http://www.daemon.com.au/
--- You are currently subscribed to farcry-dev as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
