Thanks for the explanation Geoff! On 5/19/05, Geoff Bowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Emanuel Costa wrote: > > Ok. I can see the benefits to have the unique id and I knew the > > definition about it. But, one thing I always wondered was about > > performance. Does anyone tried to use simple numeric indexes and > > compare to the UUID that Farcry have? Specially in a have load site > > with a large amount of content.... > > The performance difference between numeric and UUID indices is > negligible compared to other issues. Any complex dynamically built CMS > has performance issues -- you need to apply caching strategically. > > However, any suggestions for performance increases are always gratefully > recieved -- please lodge them here http://bugs.farcrycms.org/ > > There are lots of reasons for UUIDs. Not least they work the same > across all supported databases, you can have mixed object type > references in the same array property, you can archive content centrally > and so on. > > -- geoff > http://www.daemon.com.au/ > > --- > You are currently subscribed to farcry-dev as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/ >
-- =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+ Emanuel Costa site: http://www.emanuelcosta.com msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 8013683 Orkut: Emanuel Costa Skype: Emanweb =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+ "Everything is difficult, before it becomes easy." - Emanuel Costa --- You are currently subscribed to farcry-dev as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
