> They needed to represent the shape in CP1256. They figured that TEH > MARBUTA is similiar in joining behaviour, and replaced the glyphs in the > fonts. Thank you. I'm learning a lot here!
> (If I were > doing that in their time, I would have used DAMMATAN, drawing a HAMZA > ABOVE as a replacement glyph.) I'm sorry. You're dealing with a real blockhead here and I'm slow to understand but could you please explain why they needed to *replace* anything. Couldn't they have just *added* so we'd have dammatan, teh marbuta AND heh+hamze. _______________________________________________ FarsiWeb mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sharif.edu/mailman/listinfo/farsiweb
