their owners may be harvesting all our data for AI to replace us - but both
github and discord are absolutely fantastic in my opinion. Thank goodness
we've moved on from sourceforge and IRC which were so incredibly
un-welcoming. I don't agree with the skepticism here

discord is great once you turn off the kitschy welcome animations

oli


On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 3:58 PM Marc Lavallée via Faudiostream-users <
faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> Le 2023-03-17 à 23 h 24, Jaxter a écrit :
>
> >> I'm trying to avoid GAFAM (and the likes)
> > Just a heads-up, GitHub is owned by Microsoft.
>
> I wrote "I'm trying", not "I succeeded"... Because Faust code is hosted
> on Github, the discussion section is handy.
>
> > Discourse is the big one that I've heard of. I believe the
> > ElectroSmith Daisy forum uses it.
>
> ElectroSmith is using Discourse for the forum, and Discord is used for
> chatting (even if Discourse provide chat rooms).
>
> Discourse is "self-hostable" (on a cloud server) using Docker, or else
> it's a bit complex.
>
> > As far as synchronous chat applications go, Matrix is free,
> > self-hostable, encourages using alternative clients, and has good IRC
> > integration. Nannou and Zrythm both use it as their main chat
> > platform.
>
> Nannou also use Github and Slack.
>
> Zrythm also use SourceHut (instead of Github), Mastodon, and Libera.chat
> (for IRC). Good choices (imao).
>
> Matrix looks great. Self-hosting is work, even if there's many options
> using Python, Go, Rust...
>
> My inner Captain Obvious says: investing in communication
> infrastructures depends on possible advantages (or existential risks).
>
> Marc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Faudiostream-users mailing list
> Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users
>
_______________________________________________
Faudiostream-users mailing list
Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users

Reply via email to