Fern, re Fred Dying in Q7, I just mentioned that it would be 'impossible' to convict him for the crime due to the fact that he had died.
As for Criminal Negligence in Q3, I think you are correct re Seamus, However I think that the Negligence was on the part of Tess. She had voluntarily assumed the responsibility of taking care of Elaine and as such by neglecting to provide her with specialist care and leaving her in that state, she failed in her duty, thereby causing death. On Sep 29, 7:16 pm, Fern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For Q7 I did attempted murder, incitement, conspiracy and accessory at > the fact. I didn't really get the significant of Fred dying in the > middle of it... > > I didn't see criminal negligence manslaughter in Q3 - I thought it was > an omission to struggle, as in Bland v NHS Airedale and Ward of Court. > I thought Seamus was in the clear because of the large body of medical > opinion backing him up. Now I'm worried... > > On Sep 29, 6:49 pm, Doodles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Will someone put me out of my misery and tell me what offences you > > thought were relevant to each of the four parts of Question 7? > > > Thanks! > > > On Sep 29, 5:34 pm, tiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Exactly, onwards and upwards!! > > > > Trying to get started on constitutional now but have a lot of criminal > > > crap floating around in my head!! > > > > On Sep 29, 5:32 pm, aviationhead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Theres only two things that im disapointed with really; > > > > > (a) I talked so much about Sexual Asault on the question about the > > > > girl getting her clothes stripped off and > > > > ended up forgetting to mention S3 re Aggravated Sexual Assault. What a > > > > silly mistake, and > > > > > (b) I only had an outline knowledge of Inchoate Offences and > > > > Complicity so one of the 4 parters suffered!! > > > > > As for the Criminal Negligence, I used it in relation to the > > > > principles as outlined in Dunleavy and in Holloway re Tess breaching > > > > her voluntarily > > > > assumed duty towards Elaine. > > > > > But I suppose whats done is done at this stage and we can only do our > > > > best. > > > > > On Sep 29, 5:09 pm, tiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > My first one too. Was v nervous this morning but so happy to have > > > > > first one over with. > > > > > > I did mention criminal negligence too in respect of the doctor. > > > > > > So much information in the questions and found it took long time to > > > > > read them all, in order to decide which ones to do... > > > > > > On Sep 29, 5:07 pm, aviationhead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > I did the same as you so lets hope that we are somewhat on the right > > > > > > track then!! > > > > > > > As for the Omissions question, did anyone mention the possibility of > > > > > > Criminal Negligence Manslaughter charges being brought? > > > > > > > And Yeah all of the questions were quite busy alright. It was my > > > > > > first > > > > > > FE-1 and I now know why everyone says its impossible to > > > > > > know how you do!! > > > > > > > On Sep 29, 3:29 pm, tiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Oops didn't write any of that stuff. Concentrated on criminal > > > > > > > damage, > > > > > > > assault causing harm (indirect). oh well, nothing can be done now. > > > > > > > > On Sep 29, 3:26 pm, Bee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > The one with Lennie in the cherry picker and Jason the 14 yr old > > > > > > > > > On Sep 29, 3:19 pm, stripey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Which one was question 5? > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 29, 3:10 pm, Bee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I did anyhow so hopefully that was right! I felt this way > > > > > > > > > > when I came > > > > > > > > > > out of tort last time and I got it. Onto company now is > > > > > > > > > > right. > > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 29, 2:57 pm, Doodles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Guys in Q 5 was it appropriate to go over the mens rea > > > > > > > > > > > i.e. hyam, > > > > > > > > > > > maloney, etc.? Confused as hell with it all. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 29, 2:43 pm, Fern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi... > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wow, that was an exhausting paper. I was happy enough > > > > > > > > > > > > with it though. > > > > > > > > > > > > I was delighted that there was something on the > > > > > > > > > > > > definition of crime > > > > > > > > > > > > and something on omissions, they were what I really > > > > > > > > > > > > hoped for. Then I > > > > > > > > > > > > did the two four-part questions and the provocation > > > > > > > > > > > > question too. The > > > > > > > > > > > > difficult thing with criminal now is that you have to > > > > > > > > > > > > be prepared to > > > > > > > > > > > > write a five page essay on some weird angle of the > > > > > > > > > > > > topic (eg the quote > > > > > > > > > > > > in the provocation question was a bit nuts) or you > > > > > > > > > > > > could end up just > > > > > > > > > > > > writing a page or so in a four-parter. It'd break your > > > > > > > > > > > > heart. I really > > > > > > > > > > > > hope I get the magic 50% > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway, on to company now... > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 29, 1:13 pm, Bee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What did everyone think of criminal? They fairly > > > > > > > > > > > > > shoved in everything > > > > > > > > > > > > > they could didn't they?! The questions were very busy > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think. I just > > > > > > > > > > > > > put down anything that seemed relevant. By the time > > > > > > > > > > > > > you have read the > > > > > > > > > > > > > questions tho and gather your thoughts it does not > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave much time for > > > > > > > > > > > > > writing!- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
