Hey fern, wuldn't worry too much, I did the same for q.3 i used stone & dobinson and gibbons & proctor for Tess and Airedale and Ward of Court for Seamas and also said he was in the clear cos of the medical opinion of others. I put in Adomoko for Tess too in regards to gross negligence manslaughter. So will just have to wait and see............
On 29 Sep, 19:16, Fern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For Q7 I did attempted murder, incitement, conspiracy and accessory at > the fact. I didn't really get the significant of Fred dying in the > middle of it... > > I didn't see criminal negligence manslaughter in Q3 - I thought it was > an omission to struggle, as in Bland v NHS Airedale and Ward of Court. > I thought Seamus was in the clear because of the large body of medical > opinion backing him up. Now I'm worried... > > On Sep 29, 6:49 pm, Doodles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Will someone put me out of my misery and tell me what offences you > > thought were relevant to each of the four parts of Question 7? > > > Thanks! > > > On Sep 29, 5:34 pm, tiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Exactly, onwards and upwards!! > > > > Trying to get started on constitutional now but have a lot of criminal > > > crap floating around in my head!! > > > > On Sep 29, 5:32 pm, aviationhead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Theres only two things that im disapointed with really; > > > > > (a) I talked so much about Sexual Asault on the question about the > > > > girl getting her clothes stripped off and > > > > ended up forgetting to mention S3 re Aggravated Sexual Assault. What a > > > > silly mistake, and > > > > > (b) I only had an outline knowledge of Inchoate Offences and > > > > Complicity so one of the 4 parters suffered!! > > > > > As for the Criminal Negligence, I used it in relation to the > > > > principles as outlined in Dunleavy and in Holloway re Tess breaching > > > > her voluntarily > > > > assumed duty towards Elaine. > > > > > But I suppose whats done is done at this stage and we can only do our > > > > best. > > > > > On Sep 29, 5:09 pm, tiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > My first one too. Was v nervous this morning but so happy to have > > > > > first one over with. > > > > > > I did mention criminal negligence too in respect of the doctor. > > > > > > So much information in the questions and found it took long time to > > > > > read them all, in order to decide which ones to do... > > > > > > On Sep 29, 5:07 pm, aviationhead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > I did the same as you so lets hope that we are somewhat on the right > > > > > > track then!! > > > > > > > As for the Omissions question, did anyone mention the possibility of > > > > > > Criminal Negligence Manslaughter charges being brought? > > > > > > > And Yeah all of the questions were quite busy alright. It was my > > > > > > first > > > > > > FE-1 and I now know why everyone says its impossible to > > > > > > know how you do!! > > > > > > > On Sep 29, 3:29 pm, tiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Oops didn't write any of that stuff. Concentrated on criminal > > > > > > > damage, > > > > > > > assault causing harm (indirect). oh well, nothing can be done now. > > > > > > > > On Sep 29, 3:26 pm, Bee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > The one with Lennie in the cherry picker and Jason the 14 yr old > > > > > > > > > On Sep 29, 3:19 pm, stripey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Which one was question 5? > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 29, 3:10 pm, Bee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I did anyhow so hopefully that was right! I felt this way > > > > > > > > > > when I came > > > > > > > > > > out of tort last time and I got it. Onto company now is > > > > > > > > > > right. > > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 29, 2:57 pm, Doodles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Guys in Q 5 was it appropriate to go over the mens rea > > > > > > > > > > > i.e. hyam, > > > > > > > > > > > maloney, etc.? Confused as hell with it all. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 29, 2:43 pm, Fern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi... > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wow, that was an exhausting paper. I was happy enough > > > > > > > > > > > > with it though. > > > > > > > > > > > > I was delighted that there was something on the > > > > > > > > > > > > definition of crime > > > > > > > > > > > > and something on omissions, they were what I really > > > > > > > > > > > > hoped for. Then I > > > > > > > > > > > > did the two four-part questions and the provocation > > > > > > > > > > > > question too. The > > > > > > > > > > > > difficult thing with criminal now is that you have to > > > > > > > > > > > > be prepared to > > > > > > > > > > > > write a five page essay on some weird angle of the > > > > > > > > > > > > topic (eg the quote > > > > > > > > > > > > in the provocation question was a bit nuts) or you > > > > > > > > > > > > could end up just > > > > > > > > > > > > writing a page or so in a four-parter. It'd break your > > > > > > > > > > > > heart. I really > > > > > > > > > > > > hope I get the magic 50% > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway, on to company now... > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 29, 1:13 pm, Bee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What did everyone think of criminal? They fairly > > > > > > > > > > > > > shoved in everything > > > > > > > > > > > > > they could didn't they?! The questions were very busy > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think. I just > > > > > > > > > > > > > put down anything that seemed relevant. By the time > > > > > > > > > > > > > you have read the > > > > > > > > > > > > > questions tho and gather your thoughts it does not > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave much time for > > > > > > > > > > > > > writing!- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
