I reckon there's no right or wrong.It's like EU.Once you make a decent argument like.
Am I correct in saying there is no such thing as Art42.2.1 re the family q? On Oct 3, 4:13 pm, ShellBelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I did Q2 and most people I spoke to afterwards thought it was the > delegation to a subordinate leg but I said that it was fair procedures > in decisions by statutory bodies, O'Brien v Bord na Mona and how it > was an administrative decision to acquire prop under the Act. Am I > totally off the mark here? > > I also did the family question mixed with equality, interpretation, > sep of powers. Not sure if I identified all the issues there either. > Did anyone else think it was a really long paper? I had to leave 2 Qs > unfinished > > On Oct 3, 2:36 pm, the gaffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Yea strictly speaking only Oir can make lawss bla bla. > > Also Was healy what you'd blow on about as well for art 38.1 rights? > > > On Oct 3, 2:08 pm, Yvonne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I agree I thought it was a weird paper.. > > > > by any chance did anyone see separation of powers issues re: > > > delegation to subordinate legislature in the second question or was I > > > just imagining that!! (probably likely!)- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
