OK!!!! On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 8:43 PM, john <[email protected]> wrote:
> > NO POST MORTUMS!!! > > On Mar 23, 7:09 pm, "Catherine O'Callaghan" > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I really agree with the number of issues that were in the problem > questions. > > It's hard to cover everything in detail so I'm hoping that bullet points > > will suffice when when under pressure. Missed a few case names towards > the > > end because the pressure of time was getting to me. Was a tricky enough > > paper overall I think and if you didn't have the courts and bail etc > covered > > it made it more difficult. I didn't know those topics well enough to > write a > > decent answer on them so that may have been my downfall!! > > > > Time to put it behind me now though and focus on the next one! > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 7:04 PM, KC <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > God, the more I think about it, the worse I think I did in that! Time > > > management was a nightmare! > > > I spend 20 mins at the beginning just reading through it and trying to > > > pick questions. > > > My last one was q8 and I hardly picked out any of the issues.... > > > i was in such a rush that i focused on doctrine of common design, > > > assault causing harm, causing serious harm, and > > > lawful use of force as a defence.....I didnt even mention false > > > imprisonment, conspiracy or arson! > > > Why does he put so many issues in?.....it makes it impossible, given > > > the time constraints!! > > > > > On Mar 23, 6:44 pm, molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > God, I didnt get to mention punishment in any of the questions I did! > > > > I did 5 problem questions and found that they were extremely long and > > > > there were so many issues in the questions that it was difficult to > > > > elaborate on any one due to time constraint.eg q. 7 and 8; in the > > > > latter question i briefly outlined assault causing harm.assault > > > > causing seerious harm, false imprisonment, arson with intent to > > > > endanger life,attempted murder etc. I focused mainly on complicity > and > > > > defence of lawful use of force. for my last question I only wrote a > > > > page of bullet points. I really hope that most marks are awarded for > > > > identifying the potential offences. > > > > > > On Mar 23, 5:14 pm, seán <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > this was my first fe-1 so I its hard to really gauge how it went > > > > > without knowing how they're corrected, but i'm happy enough. If it > was > > > > > a college exam I'd be positive I got 50% at least, but I know the > gap > > > > > jump in standard they're expecting is huge. Think I got four and a > > > > > half good enough answers, though one half of my last question was > > > > > utter rubbish (the one about the woman's car being broken in to by > a > > > > > bloke with a knife)...I started waffling on about robbery before > > > > > realising he didn't actually take anything and not knowing inchoate > > > > > offences I just wrote a line about how it might have been an > attempt. > > > > > God it was dire! That aside i was happy enough, roll on the next > one : > > > > > ( > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 3:50 pm, baz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hey guys, > > > > > > > > What was the general feeling about The exam today. > > > > > > I ended up doing qstn 2, 5,6,7,8 > > > > > > Was getting a bit worried when I was reading the first few qstns > i.e. > > > > > > qstn 1, 3 and 4 as I didnt know those areas well enough to write > > > > > > essays on. In the end I thought the problem qstns were quite fair > but > > > > > > time management is tough. I really put my foot on the accelerator > to > > > > > > get the last 2 qstns done on time. > > > > > > Its my second time sitting it. Feel more confident about passing > it > > > > > > this time but its just impossible to know. I may have made a > couple > > > of > > > > > > mistakes in regard to how many years imprisonment those liable > for > > > > > > conviction would get so I hope he's not too hard on me there. I > think > > > > > > the key thing about criminal is to know a little about alot. > There > > > are > > > > > > so many combinations of issues that he throws in , you really > need to > > > > > > know the whole course! > > > > > > Its emotionally draining, the whole thing, luckily I dont have my > > > next > > > > > > one til friday so I can go to bed for a few hours! Best of luck > to > > > > > > everyone who is sitting an exam on wednesday and don,t have that > > > > > > luxury. > > > > > > As the Munster boys say Stand up and Fight. Nothing is impossible > to > > > > > > the brave and the faithful :)! > > > > > > Keep the spirits up. > > > > > > Best of luck to all concerned. > > > > > > > > Joe- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
