did the exact same as you in relation to article 87 and then took art 88 out of the book. Hopefully that was what he was looking for. Had a few cases in State Aid against the Commission done so hopefully that will do. Awful paper tho.
On Apr 4, 3:50 pm, wayne o sullivan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey guys > > Just in relation to Question 8 and Article 88 EC...How did ye approach it..I > wrote mainly on Article 87 EC and in the end tried to rope that into the > Commission role of Article 88 EC. You know the way they say answer the > question asked, well i didnt do that in the strict sense cause theres not > alot on 88 EC solely...What people think? > > --- On Fri, 3/4/09, b05bf1e4 <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: b05bf1e4 <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: EU Post Mortem > To: "FE-1 Study Group" <[email protected]> > Date: Friday, 3 April, 2009, 8:35 PM > > I actually thought the paper was easy. I did the Commission question > which was straight forward, as was the question on citizenship. The > question on state aid was also...it was a very relevant question > considering the recent guarantee schemes etc. Question 7 on Article 81 > was the easiest. It was based verbatim on the case Irish competition > authority v BIDS. He was testing whether we were up to date on our > caselaw...The last question i did was on the case notes...[Zhu & > Chen], [Laval un] but i actually forgot the facts in [van gend en > loos] I couldn't believe it, but as soon i was finished i remembered. > I could remember the judgment though "new legal order" and all > that!!! > > On Apr 3, 7:32 pm, "Notorious B.I.G" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > I thought the paper was deeply flawed. > > > The Free Movement of goods problem was obscure and at times non- > > sensical. > > Mopeds towing trailers? > > The Institutuions question was pigeon-holed and gave students little > > scope. > > The essay in question 2 was over-elaborate. > > Question three on equality/citizenship was vast and too time > > consuming. > > Direct effect had two many isolated parts and it was difficult not to > > overlap advice. > > > I just hope the marking scheme isn't as unfair! > > > > On Apr 3, 5:19 pm, aviationhead <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I agree. That was defo the most challenging paper I have come > accross. > > > > Much worse than Company last week and I was sure I had failed > that. > > > > Perhaps not so sure any more!! > > > > > Why he put up a question on the Commission, which I would think > is the > > > > institution that has the least talking points, is beyond me. > > > > > As for The sources question, I had prepared in detail the areas > of > > > > discrimination and the fundamental rights, thinking they may > come up > > > > as separate questions, but to have to outline them both in the > one > > > > question (along with legitimate expectations) was asking a lot. > > > > > I could easily find fault with every question on the paper so I > > > > suppose I had just better say that it was horrible and Im glad > that > > > > you all think the same. > > > > > Lets hope his marking scheme is a little fairer!! > > > > > On Apr 3, 4:02 pm, lukin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > it was definitely one of the toughest eu papers, let alone > blackhalls > > > > > I have ever sat - and i've sat all of them besides > tort. > > > > > > Noel travers deserves an absolute kicking right in the > behind for the > > > > > type of questions he puts up. I would be absolutely > positively shocked > > > > > if more that one handful of people could satisfactorily > answer the > > > > > case note question - having learnt 10 "seminal > > cases" from all across> > > > the course, you would think one be covered - > not could I do > one. > > > > > > The direct effect question was all over the place. > > > > > > Part A of the competition law question was one of the most > confusing > > > > > questions I have ever read. The fact that Mr. Travers > thought it > > > > > prudent to give "nicknames" to almost every > > relevant party ("stayers", > > > > > > > > "goers", etc etc etc). > > > > > > I have no problem with a testing paper - having covered all > the > > > > > course, I truly can say I was not happy with one question I > attempted > > > > > today. > > > > > > It's funny these exams are set by people who have never > have been > > > > > within an asses' roar of having to study/sit a > blackhall. > > > > > > On Apr 3, 3:01 pm, tiger <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hey all > > > > > > > I thought it was fairly bad as well. plus, the > > commission question - I> > > > > wrote an awful lot from the treaty. Don't > know > > whether I can get any> > > > > marks for that. > > > > > > > The article 82 question was tough too - the dual role? > Anyone know > > > > > > what that was about? > > > > > > > On Apr 3, 2:58 pm, molly > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > God,that was crap. Only got to do 4 quetions and > > The question on free> > > > > > movement of goods was completely bizarre, > Could > not figure out its > > > > > > > relevance to that area at all. I mean fixing > tinted stickers or > > > > > > > whatever to car windows? How does that restrict > > the free movement of> > > > > > goods? Kept looking at it thinking I must be > missing something. > > > > > > > > On Apr 3, 1:39 pm, Richard Power > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > good bit off work not whole course but a > > alot of study and prob for nothing!!! > > > > > > > > > last one aswell and was hoping bhall but may > have to wait..... > > > > > > > > > the paper was all on the difficult aspects > > of ec law, the one on direct effect took about an hr to understand!!! > > > > > > > > > > Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 05:26:45 -0700 > > > > > > > > > Subject: EU Post Mortem > > > > > > > > > From: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > I found that paper really tough - it > > was my last exam and I think I've> > > > > > > > completely screwed my > chances of going > > to B'hall this year - > > > > > > > > > > Can someone explain what question five > > was all about please? I had no> > > > > > > > idea how the second and third > parts > related to FMG?!! > > _________________________________________________________________> > > > > > > > Get 30 Free Emoticons for your Windows Live > > Messengerhttp://www.livemessenger-emoticons.com/funfamily/en-ie/-Hidequotedtext- > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
