He did outline 3 particular questions this year that he mentioned were particularly poorly answered.
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Brian Foley <[email protected]> wrote: > in the grand scheme of things the const exam reports aren't like the > others...there is no segregation of q's and an outline of what > students did etc. I think if you look at the fe1 thread on boards i > put up somewhere (or maybe here!) what the paper was about... > > On 2/5/10, edel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi > > Does anyone have the examiner report for the October 2009 > > constitutional exam? Or does anyone know what topic each question was > > based on? > > It is my last exam and I am finding it really difficult to see what > > the issues were in last years exam! > > Any help is very much appreciated! > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "FE-1 Study Group" group. > > To post to this group, send an email to > [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<fe-1-study-group%[email protected]> > . > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB. > > > > > > > -- > ____________ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "FE-1 Study Group" group. > To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<fe-1-study-group%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB.
