As in, the ratio of the T.D. decision - what it says about the separation of powers / judicial role in relation to socio-economic rights etc.
_____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of edel mcdermott Sent: 07 February 2010 08:29 To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: RE: constitutional law Brian, I dont know how to begin to thank you for breaking the exam down like that. I really am very grateful. A quick question; what do you mean when you say the ratio of the TD? > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: constitutional law > Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 13:05:11 +0000 > > Hmmmm ok...very quickly then > > 1. The AG > 2. Strict liability / limits on DC jurisdiction - minor offences / vague > definition of crime / probably more! > 3. Article 34.1 - justice in public / media freedoms etc > 4. Essay on Article 26 > 5. right to a good name / natural and constitutional justice > 6. Non-delegation - embrace of Cityview Press over "orders" (i.e. Casey > case etc) / property rights / proportionality / right to earn > 7. Separation of Powers - interference with judicial function / right to > earn > 8. equality / socio-economic issues / separation of powers - same question > asked in Q6 of April 2008 > > The general comment he repeats is that students don't understand the true > ratio of TD and the upcoming report I understand will point out that too > many students are relying (apparently) on a particular set of notes that > appear to be very outdated - i.e. cutting off their knowledge of > non-delegation in about 1998 and property rights similarly without knowing > the "new" stuff. > > Main reason for poor performance on this exam is the failure to identify the > relevant issues. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of edel > Sent: 06 February 2010 12:55 > To: FE-1 Study Group > Subject: Re: constitutional law > > Hi Brian, > > I found your thread on last years paper. I think it was the april 2009 > paper which was very helpful but I cant find the one for the october > session! > > On Feb 5, 10:56 am, Brian Foley <[email protected]> wrote: > > in the grand scheme of things the const exam reports aren't like the > > others...there is no segregation of q's and an outline of what > > students did etc. I think if you look at the fe1 thread on boards i > > put up somewhere (or maybe here!) what the paper was about... > > > > On 2/5/10, edel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > Does anyone have the examiner report for the October 2009 > > > constitutional exam? Or does anyone know what topic each question was > > > based on? > > > It is my last exam and I am finding it really difficult to see what > > > the issues were in last years exam! > > > Any help is very much appreciated! > > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > > "FE-1 Study Group" group. > > > To post to this group, send an email to > [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]. > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB. > > > > -- > > ____________- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "FE-1 Study Group" group. > To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB. > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.435 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2671 - Release Date: 02/06/10 > 07:35:00 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. > To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB. > _____ Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. Sign up now. <https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB. No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.435 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2673 - Release Date: 02/07/10 07:22:00 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB.
