Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-21 20:19 EST -------
(In reply to comment #24)
> Created an attachment (id=132852)
 --> 
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132852&action=view) 
[edit]
> patch spec to remove static libs and fix rpath breakage
> 
> Here's a spec patch for two of the issues.  It removes static libraries and
> fixes rpath.  Note that some of the files in the modules directory,
> %{_libdir}/pulse-0.9/modules, need to have an rpath to that directory because
> they have dependencies on other shared objects in there.  Before, they had a
> second rpath set on /usr/lib64 which was wrong.  Also, some of the modules do
> not have dependencies on anything within that directory.  Therefore, they
> should have no rpath set.  This patch should make all of that happy (and
> rpmlint should no longer complain about rpaths.)

The patch succesfully fixes the compile issue I pointed out earlier, thank you
very much.

Any hope of getting gst-pulse packaged as well so pulseaudio will be more useful
on a default FC desktop?
(http://0pointer.de/lennart/projects/gst-pulse/)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to