SPOILER- Jimmy the Hand > > > > > > > > >
I guess I have more of a "Jimmy the Hand" approach to life. I would only stop at red lights at 2am if there was a traffic camera. Ray has spoken. This thread clearly had energy if not substance. Where are the "Feist Master classes" though? (I trust my grammar is now more acceptable too). Sorry for any offense caused. I'll go now rewatch series 1 of "Game of thrones". Parks3 Sent from my iPad On 5/04/2012, at 5:45 AM, "Raymond E. Feist" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Apr 4, 2012, at 8:34 AM, Jason Green wrote: > >> I understand how easy it is. I'm simply stating that it's a bit silly. >> >> Do we REALLY need spoiler spaces when we're discussing a book that >> >> A) was published 30 years ago >> >> And >> >> B) was written by an author who is the focus of this list. >> >> My point is that this is a dedicated Feist email list, visited by dedicated >> fans. I make the assumption that they are dedicated because who the heck >> looks up, joins, and reads an email list about an author they don't already >> have a deep appreciation of? I would guess that is a tiny minority of the >> readers of this list. >> >> "ahhhh!!!! Spoilers please! Not everyone has read Hamlet yet!" >> >> "but, this is an advanced class about Shakeapeare's most famous works" >> >> I'm not stating that I am rebelling against spoiler spaces. I'm simply >> pointing out that it's silly. >> >> And it IS silly. >> > > > Let me stress this: > > Not everyone is the same age. We've had teenagers join this list who had > just read Magician for the first time. > > Not everyone has read every book. Faerie Tale came out 23 years ago and > there are people who haven't read the list. > > This is NOT a graduate seminar in "Feist Studies" which requires you've read > very book before you sit down. > > Got it? > > People have been asked for YEARS on this list to provide spoiler space when > any content is being discussed. If you're new to the list and you don't know > why, see the above. if you decide to argue, you're being discourteous. If > you keep arguing, I'll ask you to leave the list. > > Best, R.E.F. > ---- > www.crydee.com > > Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be explained away by > stupidity. > > > > > > >
