Without endorsing either candidate here's some thoughts I had on deciding 
between the candidates: I don't think either candidate will directly influence 
animal cruelty laws or humane practice laws.  They've got too much else to 
worry about, especially right now.  Even if they love animals it will not be 
their priority.  So, for this particular election I'm not even considering it.  
Now obviously if the candidate was a known animal abuser that would be 
different and would impact my decision.   When it comes to animal issues I tend 
to focus on the legislative branch like Congress and state reps, etc. that 
would have more influence passing legislation and laws. So, regarding animal 
welfare I'm basing my decision on who can best help me and other people help 
the animals and continue our work in animal welfare.  It's not what they will 
do, it's what they will allow me to do.  Right now the economy is a problem.  
People are losing their homes and can't keep their pets.  Donations to animal 
welfare organizations are down so they can't do as much either.  Many people 
like myself feed a bunch of feral cats.  It is hard to keep doing that when you 
can barely afford to feed your family.  I volunteer with a local humane society 
so even in our small part of the world I've seen a major increase in the number 
of pets surrendered by owners who lost their homes or just left their pets 
behind.   People have to spend more time trying to make ends meet and don't 
have time to volunteer with animal rescues etc.  Just lots of things like that. 
  Considering those kinds of things I'm looking at who can help the economy the 
most.  Each candidate has very different economic policies and very different 
approaches to boosting our economy.  So that's one thing I'm looking at hard - 
which economic policy do I think will work.  I lived in a third world country 
for two years a long time ago.  Their animals were a lot worse off than ours 
and it wasn't because the people weren't compassionate they just didn't have 
anything to be able to help their animals.  So right now I'm looking at which 
economic plan will help the country get back on it's feet so we can keep our 
pets and have time to donate and volunteer to fight for animal protection 
legislation. Healthcare is definitely something to consider but that's also 
part of the economic crisis so I'm not going to directly contribute any 
thoughts on that.   I would suggest not looking at just what the candidates say 
they will do for the animals but look at what will help us do for the animals.  
They've got too many other issues to tackle.  I'd be surprised if either one of 
them took up one animal issue whatsoever.  It's people like us who are working 
for the animals that make the difference so see what they can do for us and 
we'll do all the legwork to help the animals.  Take a look at the economic 
plans and that will help influence your decision.  I had a few basic economic 
courses in college so I understand the basics but not all the details.  I think 
if you just look at the basic models without going into too too many details it 
would be enough to make a decision. But hey, there's lots of other things to 
consider but that's where I'm at when I think about what will help the animals 
the most.
“I am not interested to know whether vivisection produces results that are 
profitable to the human race or doesn’t….the pain which it inflicts upon 
unconsenting animals is the basis of my enmity toward it, and it is to me 
sufficient justification of the enmity without looking further.” – Mark Twain
 From: taylore...@msn.com
To: felvtalk@felineleukemia.org
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 11:44:05 -0500
Subject: Re: [Felvtalk] President





Thanks for sharing that with us because I have wondered how someone in the 
healthcare industry felt about it.  
 
Speaking from the perspective of someone whose husband lost his job 3 days 
before Christmas in 2008 and all of the "promises" made by the current 
administration to help with mortgages, healthcare, etc., I'm not seeing it, nor 
were we helped in any size, shape or fashion.   With regards to healthcare, we 
were told that because I had a full time job, I could (in a nutshell) s*ck it 
up and pay out an additional $500 a month to cover my husband and his son on my 
company's insurance plan until he found a job. We were also told that we had 
too much equity in our home so we didn't qualify for any mortgage assistance 
and in the end, I simply borrowed from his and my 401K and we just made ends 
meet until 15 months later he found full time employment.
 
So, who is the better candidate?  I really don't know  :(
 
Oh and to keep on track with kitty discussions for this group and speaking of 
FeLuk, one of our kitties that we thought was feral but ended up not being 
feral, so we brought her inside was diagnosed with a rapidly advancing cancer a 
few weeks ago and she is only about 2-3 years old.  The doctor said that the 
type of cancer she has indicates that she was exposed to FeLuk as a kitten but 
managed to shed the virus since she does not have it.  Unfortunately, it did 
its damage anyway :(  SuzieQ has maybe a month to live so we are making her 
comfortable and loving on her until she lets us know that she is ready to cross 
over :(
 
From: siggies...@hotmail.com
To: felvtalk@felineleukemia.org
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 12:33:27 -0400
Subject: Re: [Felvtalk] President







Well, I have a different take on the whole healthcare thing because I work 
for a health insurance company.  I understand how the business works.  
That being said, there are good things about the "Obamacare", but there are 
some 
things that are NOT.  So I disagree that it should stand as it is.  It 
needs to be replaced.  My opinion.  I cannot speak on behalf of my 
employer.
 
Terri

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Joslin 
  Potter 
  To: felvtalk@felineleukemia.org 
  
  Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 12:29 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [Felvtalk] President
  

  
  I'm sorry to hear that, I've been taking it from people on facebook 
  as I am just trying to understand what each of them is for. For me it's 
  healthcare, that is what intrests me the most however, when it comes to 
people 
  like Mike Vick, there need to be better laws put into place, i just wondered 
  how everyone else felt, no judgement from me. Like i told a friend, we hall 
  have and know something someone else might not. 
  

  
  
  
  

  
  


_______________________________________________
Felvtalk 
      mailing 
      list
Felvtalk@felineleukemia.org
http://felineleukemia.org/mailman/listinfo/felvtalk_felineleukemia.org

_______________________________________________ 
    Felvtalk mailing list Felvtalk@felineleukemia.org 
    
http://felineleukemia.org/mailman/listinfo/felvtalk_felineleukemia.org_______________________________________________
Felvtalk 
    mailing 
    list
Felvtalk@felineleukemia.org
http://felineleukemia.org/mailman/listinfo/felvtalk_felineleukemia.org

  
_______________________________________________
Felvtalk 
  mailing list
Felvtalk@felineleukemia.org
http://felineleukemia.org/mailman/listinfo/felvtalk_felineleukemia.org


_______________________________________________
Felvtalk 
  mailing 
  list
Felvtalk@felineleukemia.org
http://felineleukemia.org/mailman/listinfo/felvtalk_felineleukemia.org


_______________________________________________
Felvtalk mailing list
Felvtalk@felineleukemia.org
http://felineleukemia.org/mailman/listinfo/felvtalk_felineleukemia.org          
                          

_______________________________________________
Felvtalk mailing list
Felvtalk@felineleukemia.org
http://felineleukemia.org/mailman/listinfo/felvtalk_felineleukemia.org          
                          
_______________________________________________
Felvtalk mailing list
Felvtalk@felineleukemia.org
http://felineleukemia.org/mailman/listinfo/felvtalk_felineleukemia.org

Reply via email to