On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:07:58 +0100 Johan Hake <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have a patched stl library as suggested by Anders. Is that the I can't see such a suggestion in this thread. > common denominator here? I don't know but my DOLFIN is compiled with -O2 -g while yours is possibly with -O2 -g -std=c++98 -Wall -Werror -pedantic -pipe because of Developer build type. (I abandoned Developer build because of some CGAL related errors.) Is it a possible cause? Should I try with -std=c++98 ? Jan > > Johan > > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Jan Blechta > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > I can't reproduce it. > > > > Jan > > > > > > On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:56:37 +0100 > > Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > The unit test geometry/BoundingBoxTree.py fails on my machines > > > (with master) but seem to pass on the buildbots. > > > > > > The test in question fails with: > > > > > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > > File "BoundingBoxTree.py", line 372, in > > > test_compute_closest_entity_3d > > > self.assertEqual(entity, reference[0]) > > > AssertionError: 5 != 4 > > > > > > Can someone else check if this test fails on your machines as > > > well? > > > > > > -- > > > Anders > > > _______________________________________________ > > > fenics mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics > > > > _______________________________________________ > > fenics mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics > > _______________________________________________ fenics mailing list [email protected] http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
