After returning:

  /usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/stl_algo.h

to its original state the unit test passed locally. At least now Anders has
something to look into ;)

J


On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Johan Hake <[email protected]> wrote:

> I removed rounding-math, std=c++98, and used Release instead of Developer
> mode but I still get the same error.
>
> I am on saucy
>
> J
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Jan Blechta 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:07:58 +0100
>> Johan Hake <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > I have a patched stl library as suggested by Anders. Is that the
>>
>> I can't see such a suggestion in this thread.
>>
>> > common denominator here?
>>
>> I don't know but my DOLFIN is compiled with
>>
>>   -O2 -g
>>
>> while yours is possibly with
>>
>>   -O2 -g -std=c++98 -Wall -Werror -pedantic -pipe
>>
>> because of Developer build type. (I abandoned Developer build because
>> of some CGAL related errors.) Is it a possible cause? Should I try with
>>
>>   -std=c++98
>>
>> ?
>>
>> Jan
>>
>> >
>> > Johan
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Jan Blechta
>> > <[email protected]>wrote:
>> >
>> > > I can't reproduce it.
>> > >
>> > > Jan
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:56:37 +0100
>> > > Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > The unit test geometry/BoundingBoxTree.py fails on my machines
>> > > > (with master) but seem to pass on the buildbots.
>> > > >
>> > > > The test in question fails with:
>> > > >
>> > > > Traceback (most recent call last):
>> > > >   File "BoundingBoxTree.py", line 372, in
>> > > >   test_compute_closest_entity_3d
>> > > >     self.assertEqual(entity, reference[0])
>> > > > AssertionError: 5 != 4
>> > > >
>> > > > Can someone else check if this test fails on your machines as
>> > > > well?
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Anders
>> > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > fenics mailing list
>> > > > [email protected]
>> > > > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > fenics mailing list
>> > > [email protected]
>> > > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
>> > >
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
fenics mailing list
[email protected]
http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics

Reply via email to