On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Garth N. Wells <[email protected]> wrote:
> Everyone could add some weight to the Ubuntu std::nth_element bug report: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.8/+bug/1246802 > > Not sure if it will help. Unfortunately I do not think it will help. We probably need to get the "heat" up. I am surprised it does not affect more people/projects. Johan > > Garth > > On 13 Nov 2013, at 20:00, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The plot thickens... > > > > I see now that nth_element is used in more than one place. I'll take a > > look tomorrow and replace it by boost::nth_element throughout. > > > > -- > > Anders > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 07:51:46PM +0100, Johan Hake wrote: > >> After returning: > >> > >> /usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/stl_algo.h > >> > >> to its original state the unit test passed locally. At least now Anders > has > >> something to look into ;) > >> > >> J > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Johan Hake <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> I removed rounding-math, std=c++98, and used Release instead of > Developer > >> mode but I still get the same error. > >> > >> I am on saucy > >> > >> J > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Jan Blechta < > [email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:07:58 +0100 > >> Johan Hake <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> I have a patched stl library as suggested by Anders. Is that the > >> > >> I can't see such a suggestion in this thread. > >> > >>> common denominator here? > >> > >> I don't know but my DOLFIN is compiled with > >> > >> -O2 -g > >> > >> while yours is possibly with > >> > >> -O2 -g -std=c++98 -Wall -Werror -pedantic -pipe > >> > >> because of Developer build type. (I abandoned Developer build > because > >> of some CGAL related errors.) Is it a possible cause? Should I > try with > >> > >> -std=c++98 > >> > >> ? > >> > >> Jan > >> > >>> > >>> Johan > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Jan Blechta > >>> <[email protected]>wrote: > >>> > >>>> I can't reproduce it. > >>>> > >>>> Jan > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:56:37 +0100 > >>>> Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> The unit test geometry/BoundingBoxTree.py fails on my machines > >>>>> (with master) but seem to pass on the buildbots. > >>>>> > >>>>> The test in question fails with: > >>>>> > >>>>> Traceback (most recent call last): > >>>>> File "BoundingBoxTree.py", line 372, in > >>>>> test_compute_closest_entity_3d > >>>>> self.assertEqual(entity, reference[0]) > >>>>> AssertionError: 5 != 4 > >>>>> > >>>>> Can someone else check if this test fails on your machines as > >>>>> well? > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> fenics mailing list > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics > >>>> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> fenics mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics > > > > _______________________________________________ > > fenics mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics > >
_______________________________________________ fenics mailing list [email protected] http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
