The plot thickens... I see now that nth_element is used in more than one place. I'll take a look tomorrow and replace it by boost::nth_element throughout.
-- Anders On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 07:51:46PM +0100, Johan Hake wrote: > After returning: > > /usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/stl_algo.h > > to its original state the unit test passed locally. At least now Anders has > something to look into ;) > > J > > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Johan Hake <[email protected]> wrote: > > I removed rounding-math, std=c++98, and used Release instead of Developer > mode but I still get the same error. > > I am on saucy > > J > > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Jan Blechta <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:07:58 +0100 > Johan Hake <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I have a patched stl library as suggested by Anders. Is that the > > I can't see such a suggestion in this thread. > > > common denominator here? > > I don't know but my DOLFIN is compiled with > > -O2 -g > > while yours is possibly with > > -O2 -g -std=c++98 -Wall -Werror -pedantic -pipe > > because of Developer build type. (I abandoned Developer build because > of some CGAL related errors.) Is it a possible cause? Should I try > with > > -std=c++98 > > ? > > Jan > > > > > Johan > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Jan Blechta > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > I can't reproduce it. > > > > > > Jan > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:56:37 +0100 > > > Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > The unit test geometry/BoundingBoxTree.py fails on my machines > > > > (with master) but seem to pass on the buildbots. > > > > > > > > The test in question fails with: > > > > > > > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > > > File "BoundingBoxTree.py", line 372, in > > > > test_compute_closest_entity_3d > > > > self.assertEqual(entity, reference[0]) > > > > AssertionError: 5 != 4 > > > > > > > > Can someone else check if this test fails on your machines as > > > > well? > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > fenics mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > fenics mailing list > [email protected] > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics _______________________________________________ fenics mailing list [email protected] http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
