Anton Khirnov (12023-04-24): > I have no idea what you mean by this. Try a little harder.
> You keep using these words. I don't think they mean what you think they > mean. Yeah, Princess Bride references are a real boost to weak arguments. > The only fact here is that the quoted paragraph is YOUR PERSONAL > OPINION, which ZERO other developers expressed support for. Or maybe I am the only one not fed up of arguing with walls. Will you dispute that each split of a structure is extra code in many places? Will you discuss that having to remember which structure a field belongs to is an extra effort? > On the other hand, the approach under discussion has explicit support > from multiple highly active developers. I have not seen this specific aspect of the issue discussed. > You are too late, many such changes have already been pushed in the last > several years. Nobody except you opposes them and the likelihood of > reversing them is extremely low. This whole thread is a pointless waste > of time that could be spend doing something actually useful. It is never too late to stop making things worse. -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
