On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 07:11:50PM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote: > > For the deinterlace filter, do we want just a vf_* wrapper for > > imgconvert functions or should the code be ported to the > > vf_deinterlace filter? > > It should be ported, lavfi should not depend on lavc (that is it > should be usable without any libavcodec installed).
Uh, any of the advanced deinterlace filters and some more of MPlayer's filters depend on lavc. I don't think Michael will accept if you propose to duplicate half the snow encoder in lavfi. So except for basic functionality I don't see that much point in avoid a dependency on lavc if it duplicates more than just a few lines of code. _______________________________________________ FFmpeg-soc mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-soc
