On 04/05/2010 12:19 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 08:11:26PM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
On date Monday 2010-04-05 19:32:59 +0200, Reimar Döffinger encoded:
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 07:11:50PM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
For the deinterlace filter, do we want just a vf_* wrapper for
imgconvert functions or should the code be ported to the
vf_deinterlace filter?
It should be ported, lavfi should not depend on lavc (that is it
should be usable without any libavcodec installed).
Uh, any of the advanced deinterlace filters and some more of MPlayer's
filters depend on lavc.
I don't think Michael will accept if you propose to duplicate half the
snow encoder in lavfi.
So except for basic functionality I don't see that much point in avoid
a dependency on lavc if it duplicates more than just a few lines of
code.
Yes of course some filter may depend on lavc. As for what regards the
deinterlacing implemented in imgconvert.c it looked to me simple
enough to not require to add a dependancy just for that, also I think
that feature (as well as cropping/padding in lavc) is going to be
deprecated.
Sure, I don't object to your "conclusion", just the reasoning you gave
seemed not quite right to me, the above seems like a better one to me.
Well, yadif should be ported :)
--
Baptiste COUDURIER
Key fingerprint 8D77134D20CC9220201FC5DB0AC9325C5C1ABAAA
FFmpeg maintainer http://www.ffmpeg.org
_______________________________________________
FFmpeg-soc mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-soc
