On date Monday 2010-04-05 19:32:59 +0200, Reimar Döffinger encoded: > On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 07:11:50PM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote: > > > For the deinterlace filter, do we want just a vf_* wrapper for > > > imgconvert functions or should the code be ported to the > > > vf_deinterlace filter? > > > > It should be ported, lavfi should not depend on lavc (that is it > > should be usable without any libavcodec installed). > > Uh, any of the advanced deinterlace filters and some more of MPlayer's > filters depend on lavc. > I don't think Michael will accept if you propose to duplicate half the > snow encoder in lavfi. > So except for basic functionality I don't see that much point in avoid > a dependency on lavc if it duplicates more than just a few lines of > code.
Yes of course some filter may depend on lavc. As for what regards the deinterlacing implemented in imgconvert.c it looked to me simple enough to not require to add a dependancy just for that, also I think that feature (as well as cropping/padding in lavc) is going to be deprecated. Regards. _______________________________________________ FFmpeg-soc mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-soc
