On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 08:11:26PM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote: > On date Monday 2010-04-05 19:32:59 +0200, Reimar Döffinger encoded: > > On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 07:11:50PM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote: > > > > For the deinterlace filter, do we want just a vf_* wrapper for > > > > imgconvert functions or should the code be ported to the > > > > vf_deinterlace filter? > > > > > > It should be ported, lavfi should not depend on lavc (that is it > > > should be usable without any libavcodec installed). > > > > Uh, any of the advanced deinterlace filters and some more of MPlayer's > > filters depend on lavc. > > I don't think Michael will accept if you propose to duplicate half the > > snow encoder in lavfi. > > So except for basic functionality I don't see that much point in avoid > > a dependency on lavc if it duplicates more than just a few lines of > > code. > > Yes of course some filter may depend on lavc. As for what regards the > deinterlacing implemented in imgconvert.c it looked to me simple > enough to not require to add a dependancy just for that, also I think > that feature (as well as cropping/padding in lavc) is going to be > deprecated.
Sure, I don't object to your "conclusion", just the reasoning you gave seemed not quite right to me, the above seems like a better one to me. _______________________________________________ FFmpeg-soc mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-soc
