On 15 May 2026 20:24:37 CEST, Rob Hallam via ffmpeg-user 
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Fri, 15 May 2026 at 15:16, Elliot Smith via ffmpeg-user
><[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 5/15/2026 7:30 AM, Reindl Harald via ffmpeg-user wrote:
>> > Am 15.05.26 um 14:26 schrieb Richard via ffmpeg-user:
>> > > [snip]
>> >> credit and kudos for kind words received and no thanks for harsh words
>> >
>> > you woul dhave dserved much more hrash words for your initial posting
>> > because it's common sense to provide informations one can work with
>>
>> This sort of malevolent attitude is why we can't have nice things.
>> Cancerous psychology undermines so many collaborative projects.
>
>Thank you for bringing this up. This is a good time to provide the periodic
>reminder to the list that the Code of Conduct exists [0]. What cannot be
>said within the parameters of that should not be said.
>
>Further advice on what to do in such circumstances was provided by Thilo
>a while back [1].
>
>Cheers,
>Rob
>
>[0]: https://ffmpeg.org/community.html#Code-of-Conduct
>[1]: https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-user/2023-February/056013.html
>__________________________________________

Hi Rob

Thank you very much for reminding us again about the CoC and the Rules & 
Etiquette. I don’t know whether my comments contributed to this or not. But 
perhaps they did. 

It wasn’t my intention to give Richard an excessive telling-off, but I was 
surprised that he didn’t post the terminal’s input and output after being asked 
to do so. It wasn’t really helpful. 


That’s all I have to say on the matter.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to