Am 16.05.26 um 00:31 schrieb Rob Hallam via ffmpeg-user: > On Fri, 15 May 2026 at 22:22, Andreas Kuhlen via ffmpeg-user > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Thank you very much for reminding us again about the CoC and the Rules & >> Etiquette. I don’t know whether my comments contributed to this or not. But >> perhaps they did. >> It wasn’t my intention to give Richard an excessive telling-off, but I was >> surprised that he didn’t post the terminal’s input and output after being >> asked to do so. It wasn’t really helpful. >> >> That’s all I have to say on the matter. > Thanks for your additional response. > > For the avoidance of doubt, I brought up the CoC in the context of > the part of the thread I was replying to. > > I have no official standing to judge, but if it helps you I believe people > who take the time to pause and reflect on their actions (as you have done) > are doing the right thing. > > There is a distinction between pointing out what someone has > provided is not helpful [0]; and attacking the person personally > for not being helpful. I am not sure the latter can be justified in > light of the CoC. > > (Further discussion should probably be taken to a new thread.) > > Cheers, > Rob > > [0]: saying why it is not helpful is usually beneficial- eg I should > have been more direct that the information was not complete rather > than saying 'people will guess' > Thanks Rob!
Your thoughts on the matter make sense. Going into further detail in this thread would just make it too long-winded. Let’s leave it at that for now. If there’s still a need, a separate thread can be started on this. Although there’s no need to pick this apart philosophically. We should have enough common sense to realise that. Take care, Andy _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
