>u wouldn't be referring to the "anti-halation" layer, would you ?
Yes, that is exactly what I was referring to. I somehow got my words
twisted; truly sorry about that and any confusion it may have caused.
Thanks for the correction.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
johnprendergast.freeserve.co.uk
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 3:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Profiling, Ilford XP2 and Vuescan.
Anti-aliasing layer ????, you wouldn't be referring to the "anti-halation"
layer, would you ?
----- Original Message -----
From: Laurie Solomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 8:40 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Profiling, Ilford XP2 and Vuescan.
> I will not attempt to explain what the anti-aliasing layer is or does
since
> I doubt if I caould do so with adequate clarity. There may be others on
the
> list who can speack to that subject. As for the rest of what you have
said,
> you are right, it would take on a cast of the opposite color if scanned
with
> a color setting; but whether or not it is green would probably depend on
> whether you scanned in RBG or in CYMK.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> johnprendergast.freeserve.co.uk
> Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 11:20 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: Profiling, Ilford XP2 and Vuescan.
>
>
> Surely, if the purple anti aliasing tint, (whatever that is), is still
> present, when scanning with the colour setting, you would possibly get a
> green cast, not purple, because you get the opposite colours when turning
a
> neg into a positive image, just a thought. Please do hesitate to ask for
> clarification if you find any of this, vague or ambiguous.
>
>
> ...SNIP...
>
>
