On 28.04.2002 8:38 Uhr, d. collins wrote > Why limit the fonts to defaults, when you're not going to limit the other > aspects: line thickness, slurs, ties, stems, beaming, spacing, margins, > etc. to the defaults? Even if this is a competition between different > programs, the idea is getting the best out of it, and certainly not using > its default settings. Some programs may allow you, for instance, to mix > fonts in the music or in the text, others not. Why not take into account > such a difference? Some programs offer different fonts to choose from, > others only one.
Dennis, I think you are now contradicting yourself: Either you allow any fonts to be used as music fonts, in that case the fact whether a certain software package comes with several different, good looking fonts, or with only one ugly (Petrucci) font is not taken into account. I think my choice would be to limit music fonts to anything the software comes with, and to allow any text fonts. No Symbol fonts should be allowed. Johannes -- http://www.musikmanufaktur.com http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
