On 28.04.2002 22:21 Uhr, d. collins wrote > David H. Bailey �crit: >> One would have to depend upon the integrity of the engravers to live up to >> the constraints of the competition. I would hope that would not be an issue. > > I think it would be asking quite a bit from them to spend hours doing > manually what they are used to doing in a few seconds with one of Tobias's, > Robert's or Jari's plug-ins, knowing that the end result will be exactly > the same and that they are simply loosing a good night's sleep to live up > to the constraints. Don't forget that most of the participants will be > doing this during their spare time.
I agree with Dennis. Although I haven't made up my mind about fonts, I have made it up about plugins: Any plugins allowed, but they should all be listed on the accompanying problem sheet. I think perhaps I should rephrase this "competition" as comparison, with the goal being to find out where computer music engraving stands today. I am not interested in a "winner", instead I want to know where each app has it's weaknesses. Of course there will be a "winner", but that will probably be a mixture between person and program, no matter how one phrases the competition. Johannes -- http://www.musikmanufaktur.com http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
