On Jun 22, 2004, at 8:00 AM, Andrew Stiller wrote:
Ah. What you call a workaround is to me standard operating procedure. I find proofreading hardcopy much more reliable than doing it onscreen. Also, there are always little details that just don't show up on the screen, so it would be necessary to proof a printed copy anyway.
I too do all my proofreading on hard copy. In fact, I make a point of taking it to another desk in a completely different room. The idea of proofing on the screen seems horrid to me, but I suppose it's partly a matter of what type of work one does. I do mostly high-quality work where I care about tiny details of spacing, etc. For me, most pieces go through three drafts, sometimes more, rarely fewer. If you just want something readable with no wrong notes, I suppose proofing isn't as crucial. (But even then I doubt I'd want to proof on the screen. Just thinking about it gives me a headache.)
mdl
_______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
