Now I understand -- why not just have the 2 regions?
I can't figure out how to accomplish what you're asking without either 2 regions or one region defined to start in the second measure as measure 1 and a 0 added as an expression.
Sorry I can't offer you better help! :-(
David
Dan Rupert wrote:
Because, although my method *will* display the zero, subsequent numbers are
then incorrect after bar 9. They reset beginning with 00.
-----Original Message-----
From: dhbailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 3:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Finale] Measure number zero
I'm confused -- If you know how to do it, why are you asking?
Just edit the existing measure number region following the steps you have outlined, and be sure to UNcheck Hide First Number in Region and it shows up with measure 0 just as you want.
_______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
-- David H. Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
