David W. Fenton wrote:

I don't agree that it's problematic to indicate something like E = E when there's a change of time signature whose interpretation is ambiguous. The hard part is when it's something like Q = H, where it may be that the old quarter equals the new half, or the old half equals the new quarter.

Provided it's positioned with the '=' directly over the barline, I don't see how there could be any ambiguity in this. I've never encountered anyone getting confused by such a notation.
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to