On 12 Jul 2005 at 10:21, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote: > So the remedy is there if it's needed, but look, it doesn't change the > de facto theft of my creative work, mundane as it may seem. > Furthermore, these guys make money from ad clicks on what is basically > an automated service exploiting the work of thousands of authors, and > that is unacceptable to me.
Well, OpenSubscriber.com appears to be the only one of the three services mentioned here that is currently subscribed to the list, so it's the only one to be concerned about at this point. > I'm looking for consensus from the group before I send a formal > takedown notice to their web hosts. I think that's up to the list owner, don't you think? One of the other two sites that you identified has a specific mechanism for a list owner to request removal of a list. Any of these sites ought to have that as a starting point. Indeed, they ought to seek list owner permission before subscribing! Then it's up to a list owner to determine the consensus of user opinion. -- David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton David Fenton Associates http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc All non-quoted content (c) David W. Fenton, all rights reserved _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
