At 10:54 PM 07/27/2005, David W. Fenton wrote:
>So, you've just discovered that Mac anti-aliasing is better than
>Windows?
David, do you enjoy picking fights? Because now you're just being
silly. This isn't a question of better anti-aliasing -- the Win
screenshot looks like total crap. If this had to do with
anti-aliasing, then the characters in the Win screenshot would at
least have the same shape and size but would look more pixillated
around the edges. But they're not pixillated, they're just chunky.
>Doesn't sound lame to me. Mac has significant differences in its font
>rendering technologies, and always has, and that's one of the reasons
>graphics people prefer the Mac.
I'm saying it's lame that they weren't able to come up with an
alternate solution for Windows that looks better than it does. Maybe
this is easier on the Mac, but I'm sure there are lots of things in
Finale that are easier on one platform than on the other, and yet
they still have to find a way to make things work the same on both platforms.
Aaron.
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
