Johannes,
Please forgive my ignorance, as I am certain you have excellent
reasons for doing what you did -- but I must admit, I have never seen
this notation before (especially your elegant solution to m.14). I'm
intrigued by your decision-making process. If you don't mind
enlightening me: why couldn't the displaced notes in mm. 9, 14, & 15
have shared a stem with the upper or lower note of the same duration?
- Darcy
-----
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://secretsociety.typepad.com
Brooklyn, NY
On 09 May 2006, at 3:25 AM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 09.05.2006 Jacki Barineau wrote:
Thanks a bunch - it definitely looks better in this case with a
single stem due to the flags all hanging out, which makes it look
like a 32nd note!
Naturally, if you were to leave them as individual stems, you would
have to move at least one note sideways to show that they are not
the same part. If you want to see an example where this had to be
done, look here:
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com/Ressourcen/Pisendel.gif
measure 9, 14 and 15.
Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
