Oh, lets see, why would a Mac user need a high-powered machine. Perhaps
Final Cut Pro? Logic?
Maybe cause they want something fast?
And you can't run Mac OS X on non-apple hardware.
Phil Daley wrote:
At 8/8/2006 04:20 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
>The interesting thing to see is when Apple's standard desktops come
>out, rather than their high-end workstations. My bet is that they
>will be somewhat cheaper than comparably configured PCs, but
>substantially more expensive than a standard Windows workstation,
>because, as has historically been the case, they will be higher end
>machines from the basic design up.
Right. And why do Mac users need such a high-power machine?
Has anyone run the Mac OS on a cheap Windows machine?
I'd be interested in the performance differences.
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
