--- "Fiskum, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm glad they made you happy with this "feature." I
> for one am not happy
> with this decision. There is no reason they could
> not have incorporated both
> ways of approaching this issue.
> 

The more I thought about it the more I felt I could
understand why they couldn't incorporate both methods
easily. The possibility is certainly there, but I
don't believe it's a simple matter of retaining a
feature, but rather redeveloping it.

That feature in 2006 was never like a typical document
setting. Rather it acted like a one-time
respace-staves action that took place during the
extraction process. If you added staves to a part
after it was extracted, those staves did not take on
the spacing indicated in that dialog, but rather used
the normal spacing value that always is applied when
we add new staves to a score.

This implementation would not have worked in the
Linked Parts system. When you go and add a staff to a
part in the Manage Parts dialog, that linked part is
not recreated. All of the settings that were in it
beforehand are retained, including the staff spacing
of staves that remained in the part. It wouldn't be
good if simply adding or removing a staff from a part
blew away all of the changes we had made to that part
(which is what recreating the part would mean).

Trying to fit the command in during actual part
extraction wouldn't work well either, since the whole
thing was designed to create an extracted part that
retained all changes that had been made to the linked
part it came from.

What we essentially need here is a completely new
feature that allows the user to specify an actual
document setting for the spacing of newly
created/added staves, and ideally this feature would
allow separate settings for the score and parts.

Tyler

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to