At 05:28 AM 7/18/2007 -0400, dhbailey wrote:
>Heck, if someone had asked me if it were possible entirely in Finale, 
>I'd have said "No." and you've just shown me that a determined and quite 
>excellent Finale user could do what I would have thought impossible

But I was doing these things -- albeit not so easily or as prettily -- in
Finale 2.2, during my first week of using the program almost fifteen years
ago.

Among the first scores I put into Finale 2.2 were:
"Withered" (1971)
<http://maltedmedia.com/people/bathory/music/pdf/withered.pdf>
"Specimen" (1973)
<http://maltedmedia.com/people/bathory/music/pdf/specimen.pdf>
"Thièle" (1992)
<http://maltedmedia.com/people/bathory/music/pdf/thiele.pdf>

These PDFs were redone -- but by importing the 2.2 scores into later
versions of Finale, not re-doing them. Some later Finale additions
(especially staff styles) made many of these things easier, but the heart
of doing flexible work was already in Finale that far back.

Maybe this kind of scoring can be done in Sibelius (the quarter-tone piece
can), but when I see PDFs of new music online, they turn out to have been
done in Score (here's one: <http://www.scoremus.com/psexm2.html> ), many in
Finale, some in Graphire (here's one:
<http://www.graphire.com/Pages/MP/Examples/MPslip.htm> ) and Lilypond
(here's one: <http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/input/proportional> ), and the
remainder largely in graphical programs (where I believe many of the
Stockhausen scores where done).

Should there be Sibelius examples, I'd certainly like to see them. But I
haven't yet, and until they appear, I'll caution anyone who says they are a
composer and publisher about to switch to Sibelius.

As you say, this advanced notation is of interest to a small proportion of
Finale users. How does proportion translate into actual numbers, though?
Maybe I just travel in niche compositional circles, but I don't think so.

If Finale improves its handling of notation, it will become the program of
choice for new composition (and cost my clients less -- those staggered
barlines are still a bear). As it stands, Finale can't compete with
Sibelius for the educational or traditional scoring market. It's just
losing that en masse. Finale's strength has never been ease-of-use, but
depth of features, and it continues to be a mystery to me why they refuse
to clean up all the bugs and reinforce the deeper features that have always
distinguished the program as truly professional.

Dennis




_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to