But people work differently, so, say you have two people who are fluent in both, but one thinks better doing things like Finale does it, and the other thinks like how Sibelius thinks.
It is really a lame question. What you really need to do, if you are really interested in it, is to download both demos, and try them out. Then YOU can figure out what works best for YOU. On 2/18/08, Adam Golding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not in the slightest. Suppose that someone is maximally fluent in both > programs--that is to say, they use each program as fast as humanly > possible. It doesn't follow that they use each program at the same speed, > since the maximum humanly possible speed might be different for each > program. I'm pretty sure the user interface of each program imposes some > upper bound. > > On 18/02/2008, Eric Dannewitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Wouldn't being fluent in one or the other or both really make it a moot > > point? > > > > > > On 2/18/08, Adam Golding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Can anyone fluent in both Finale 2008 and Sibelius 5 comment on which is > > > actually faster to work in? If one isn't trying to create publishable > > > scores, but merely trying to get scores and parts that an orchestral > > > librarian would accept for rehearsal, I get the impression that sibelius > > 5 > > > is much faster, but it's hard to tell without being fluent in both... > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Finale mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Finale mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale > > > _______________________________________________ > Finale mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale > _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
