On 14 Nov 2008 at 21:49, dc wrote: > dc écrit: > >David W. Fenton écrit: > >>Prove me wrong, Dennis -- show me that there are notes, and that this > >>is not an example of commercial promotion (i.e., advertising speak) > >>at the expense of academic rigor. > > > >Well, I have Edmund Bowles' volume on the Middle Ages. He is a renowned > >scholar. All the iconography has notes - identifying the exact source, the > >instruments seen, etc. And the other books I've seen are all the works of > >scholars specialized in the field in question (the ballet de cour, for > >instance). But, if you're out to damn them without knowing anything about > >these books, I'm afraid I can't help you. > > There's also a long introduction, with 16 very scholarly footnotes.
In which volume? The Lesure or the Bowles? I don't understand what the Bowles has to do with the question of whether or not the Lesure has notes or not. -- David W. Fenton http://dfenton.com David Fenton Associates http://dfenton.com/DFA/ _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
