On Wed, November 20, 2013 11:15 am, Eric Dannewitz wrote: > Again, what do you want? What would be "real innovation"? Making it work > better on Mac os x? Providing more sounds? Define a fileformat for the > future? What? > I think both finale and Sibelius are pretty much the top of what you can do > with notation. I don't really know what people expect other than little > refinements to the programs in each version.
This is what I posted in the NewMusicBox discussion a few weeks ago. This is what these programs can do, instead of mucking around in 'little refinements' -- come into the 21st century: "...It’s a far cry from the promise of notation software when Finale first arrived a quarter-century ago. "My wishlist for notation software includes full vector graphical editing (right down to bending staves and having their contents follow), full audio editing capability linked to Sonar, Audition and Vegas (and whatever equivalent Mac folks use), integration where possible with Pd/AudioMulch/Max, pen (handwritten notation) input and editing, and integration/scripting of algorithmic and generative routines." Dennis _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
