On 12/16/18 9:41 AM, Max Horn wrote:
Hi all,
thanks for the feedback, I have fixed the ARCHFLAGS now and made the code
generally more robust, adding a new helper Fink::Services::get_sdkpath() which
returns an empty string on Darwin < 18 and the SDK path as returned by `xcrun
--sdk macosx --show-sdk-path`. I believe it would make sense to change that Darwin
version cutoff to a lower value, but for now wanted to play it safe.
The perlmodule builds fine now, but python is still broken. Hanspeter hinted
that normally it finds zlib; so I am guessing this might be another case where
the SDK path needs to be inserted somewhere. I'll take a look.
In general, I noticed that in various .info files, we might have to start using
the SDK path now. Perhaps time to introduce %{sdkpath} for that? Any concerns
about doing just that?
E.g. in libcurl4.info, we have this in the PatchScript:
/bin/cp /usr/include/lber*.h .
/bin/cp /usr/include/ldap*.h .
/bin/cp /usr/lib/libldap.dylib .
That is of course easy to adjust (and indeed, I just see that somebody did it).
But there is also this in ConfigureParams:
ConfigureParams: <<
--with-darwinssl \
--without-ssl \
--without-gnutls \
--with-libssh2=%p \
--with-gssapi=/usr \
...
and that last line could be easily turned into
--with-gssapi=%{sdkpath}/usr \
fink-buildenv-modules currently can set SDK_PATH (tested through Xcode9)
[1] but this could easily be folded into fink code if it would help more
there. The above snippet --with-pkg=/path is very common throughout our
.info jungle.
Hanspeter
[1]
https://github.com/nieder/fink-buildenv-modules/blob/master/modules/base.sh.in#L56
_______________________________________________
fink-core mailing list
fink-core@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.core
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-core
