At 2:52 Uhr +0900 14.03.2002, Masanori Sekino wrote: >Libraries in glib2 are named: > >libglib-2.0.la >libglib-2.0.dylib >libglib-2.0.0.dylib >libglib-2.0.0.0.0.dylib > >So, package name `fooN' will become glib2-0, where foo=glib2, N=0 >and hyphen is for distinguish N=0 with N=20.
I don't get that logic. Do you want to say, you do this to be prepared for glib 20.0 ? I mean, what is bad about the package name glib2? Assuming there will be a version 2.2, it will be glib2-2.2 If say 2.4 was binary incompatible, we could make a glib24-2.4 package, however, I strongly doubt that will be necessary - for a binary compatibility break, they'll go to version 3 I think. Max -- ----------------------------------------------- Max Horn Software Developer email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> phone: (+49) 6151-494890 _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
