hmmm I can't see why not but instead of adding more to the build time run
add it to the fink check command, which I hope all fauthors are using
right? :P
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>I have another small proposal to make related to the long-term shared
>libraries
>project: I suggest that we add a new boolean field BuildDependsOnly. If
>it is "true", the package it is in would not be "allowed" to be Depended
>on
>by any other package, only BuildDepends would be allowed. Fink won't
>actually enforce this, it will only issue a warning, but it would be a
>good method (I think) to remind developers that they are not supposed to
>be having another package Depend on this one.
>
>So, when packaging software with shared libraries, your package "foo"
>which contains headers and the libfoo.dylib symlink would say
>"BuildDependsOnly: true", while the package "foo-shlibs" would have no
>restriction like that.
>
>Any reactions to this, for or against?
�.��^`�.,][JFH][`�.,��.��][JFH][�.��^`�.,
Justin F. Hallett - Systems Analyst
Phone: (780)-408-3094
Fax: (780)-454-3200
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.��^`�.,][JFH][`�.,��.��][JFH][�.��^`�.,
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
