hmmm I can't see why not but instead of adding more to the build time run add it to the fink check command, which I hope all fauthors are using right? :P
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >I have another small proposal to make related to the long-term shared >libraries >project: I suggest that we add a new boolean field BuildDependsOnly. If >it is "true", the package it is in would not be "allowed" to be Depended >on >by any other package, only BuildDepends would be allowed. Fink won't >actually enforce this, it will only issue a warning, but it would be a >good method (I think) to remind developers that they are not supposed to >be having another package Depend on this one. > >So, when packaging software with shared libraries, your package "foo" >which contains headers and the libfoo.dylib symlink would say >"BuildDependsOnly: true", while the package "foo-shlibs" would have no >restriction like that. > >Any reactions to this, for or against? ¸.·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][JFH][¸.·´^`·., Justin F. Hallett - Systems Analyst Phone: (780)-408-3094 Fax: (780)-454-3200 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][JFH][¸.·´^`·., _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel