okay point taken and I'm game if approved could we add documentation for
it on the website. my docs are far behind now with all the new changes :P
I'm a paper guy still need to print em :P
And BTW it was fink validate that i was referring to with fink check.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Actually, we can worry about the implementation later. We won't want to
>implement this until the later stages of the shared libraries project,
>when most packages have been converted over to the new system. However,
>it would be good to start using the BuildDependsOnly field now, easier
>to put it in now than to go and add it to lots of packages later.
>
>(The only thing we would need to do immediately would be to add
>BuildDependsOnly to the list of allowed fields, so that "fink validate"
>doesn't complain about it.)
>
> -- Dave
�.��^`�.,][JFH][`�.,��.��][JFH][�.��^`�.,
Justin F. Hallett - Systems Analyst
Phone: (780)-408-3094
Fax: (780)-454-3200
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.��^`�.,][JFH][`�.,��.��][JFH][�.��^`�.,
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
