Max, thanks for continuing this here. I am sure you understand that this is nothing personal, we are all trying to find out what is best for the future of Fink. And please take my slightly too sharp arguments as I am taking yours: as an effort to bring the discussion to the point more quickly. I am not yet responding to your arguments, I would like to hear some others first. But I have to add one thing, a
Disclaimer: I am not and have not been speaking in any way for the author of FinkCommander, Steven J. Burr. And I have nothing to do with the development of FC. As far as I know, this is his work alone. My only relation to FinkCommander is my conviction that can be useful for many, my suggestion to put a fink package description on the package submission tracker, and my help in creating it. -- Martin Max Horn wrote: > > I think it is of interest for more people, so instead of continuing > this on a tracker item > <http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=414256&aid=543612&group_id=17203> > I post my biiig reply to fink-devel: [big reply snipped] _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
