At 16:15 Uhr -0700 14.04.2002, Steven Burr wrote:
>  On Sunday, April 14, 2002, at 10:44 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
>
>>Disclaimer: I am not and have not been speaking in any way for the
>>author of FinkCommander, Steven J. Burr. And I have nothing to do with
>>the development of FC. As far as I know, this is his work alone. My only
>>relation to FinkCommander is my conviction that can be useful for many,
>>my suggestion to put a fink package description  on the package
>>submission tracker, and my help in creating it.
>
>I should probably add clarification on a couple of points, but then 
>I'll be quiet an let you all sort this out.  I have not up until now 
>offered FinkCommander in binary form or announced it on any list 
>other than fink-devel, because I wanted to make sure it was fairly 
>stable before offering it to general fink users.

Understood!


>At the time Martin contacted me about submitting a package, 
>SourceForge was reporting that about 70 people had downloaded v. 
>0.1.3, and I had not received any bug reports.  (The CVS version is 
>another story, unfortunately.)  So it seemed an opportune time to 
>make FC more widely available.   I still think that's the case, so I 
>will probably make the next release available in binary format, 
>regardless of what decision you make on the fink package.

I would strongly support this. If there is anything I can do to help 
there (regading SF file release system, or automating the creation of 
disk images, or whatever you may need), feel free to drop by a line.


Cheers,

Max
-- 
-----------------------------------------------
Max Horn
Software Developer

email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
phone: (+49) 6151-494890

_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to