At 10:10 Uhr +0200 22.04.2002, Martin Costabel wrote: >Max Horn wrote: >> >> At 22:22 Uhr +0100 20.04.2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote: >[] >> >Also, "gcc" is gcc3, and I think configure scripts search that >> >first. Not to mention, we'll probably want to move to the gcc3 tool >> >chain ASAP anyway. :-) >> >> Do we? Why? >[] >> Don't think so. > >I don't think so either. The c++ compiler is still severely broken and >fails on every fink package I tried so far (mostly by accident by >letting g++-3.1 lying around while doing a fink selfupdate). The latest >was apt.
Yeah. Also there are some other quirks in there (like they define the symbol MACOSX in one gcc3 header, which breaks some stuff for me on its own; they are going to fix that, though). >BTW, what sense does it make to split apt into several pieces? No other >package depends on it. I don't see a reason for that, either... nor do I see one for splitting libtool, but that's another story :-) Max -- ----------------------------------------------- Max Horn Software Developer email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> phone: (+49) 6151-494890 _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
