Max Horn wrote: > > At 22:22 Uhr +0100 20.04.2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote: [] > >Also, "gcc" is gcc3, and I think configure scripts search that > >first. Not to mention, we'll probably want to move to the gcc3 tool > >chain ASAP anyway. :-) > > Do we? Why? [] > Don't think so.
I don't think so either. The c++ compiler is still severely broken and fails on every fink package I tried so far (mostly by accident by letting g++-3.1 lying around while doing a fink selfupdate). The latest was apt. BTW, what sense does it make to split apt into several pieces? No other package depends on it. -- Martin _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
