On Tuesday, November 5, 2002, at 04:45 PM, Max Horn wrote:
As I stated on IRC. It's fine by me to put in such a package, however, the name "system-cups" is IMO not appropriate. Rather it should be called "cups-headers" or "cups-dev".Figures, I see this e-mail *after* I commit system-cups. =)
I totally forgot you had mentioned that on IRC. I've gone ahead and fixed it to be cups-dev, and checked the fixed version into unstable.
Reasoning: We so far used the system- prefix only for pure placeholder packages, i.e. packages of type "nosource" or "bundle". I am strictly in favor of keeping it this way.Makes sense to me.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
